Tuesday, June 28, 2011


Should Ratan Tata advise Mukesh Ambani about how to use his wealth?

A couple of days ago famous industrialist Ratan Tata commented about the lavish life style of another billionaire business tycoon Mukesh Ambani quoting his 27 storied Mumbai house viz., Antilla. Tata said that Mukesh Ambani's house Antilla represents the rich Indian's lack of empathy for the poor. His remarks: "The person who lives in there should be concerned about what he sees around him and [asking] can he make a difference. If he is not, then it's sad because this country needs people to allocate some of their enormous wealth to finding ways of mitigating the hardship that people have." 

Is Ratan Tata right in his remarks or is he misguided in his judgements? Is he aware about the role of an entrepreneur in an economy or is he ignorant of this basic economic fact? Or is his remarks has some underlying assumptions which make those remarks perfectly apt for Mukesh's lifestyle? Let me deal with these questions one by one. I take two scenarios to carry out my analysis. In first scenario we assume that Mukesh Ambani is an honest entrepreneur and his profit comes from the market competition. In second scenario we assume that, Mukesh is not an honest entrepreneur and his profit comes from his business ties with government officials and his manipulation of the system of State. We see the implications of Ratan Tata's remarks under both these scenarios.

Scene 1: Mukesh is an honest entrepreneur
I first make an assertion and then go onto prove it. If Mukesh is an honest entrepreneur then his profit - which he earned in the market competition - is absolutely legitimate, and if he don't desire to do a philanthropist work then that is his voluntary choice. Ratan Tata has no right whatsoever to advise Mukesh about allocating his honestly hard earned wealth amongst the poor people or to comment on his lavish lifestyle.

As Ludwig von Mises explained, the only way in which an entrepreneur can make profit in the market competition is by serving and fulfilling the most urgent wants of his customers in the best possible way, and that best possible way is of providing top quality goods at the lowest possible price. Only those entrepreneurs succeed and make profit in the market process who can ascertain and fulfill the subjective wants of customers in the best way compared to his counterparts. 

By producing and selling top quality goods at a lowest possible price successful entrepreneurs allow even the very poor people to buy his products. By allowing them to buy his products he lifts their standard of living; he lifts them out of their poverty even without raising their nominal meager income. That happens because with the falling prices in the market with the same amount of nominal income people can now buy more goods and services i.e., their real income rises. And no sane person will deny that this is the real way of increasing prosperity in the society; this is the true way of eliminating poverty and lifting the standard of living of millions of poor people. 

Philanthropy, about which Ratan Tata is advising Mukesh, will only help poor people in a very short run i.e., for the urgent immediate consumption purposes. Such help to poor people will actually harm them in the long run by making them dependent on such easy free money. It will not cultivate any habit of hard work and independent living in those people. Redistributing the income will only exacerbate the problem of poverty because human nature is such that most people will always prefer the free goods. Such allocation of rich peoples' income will make everyone of us poor too because rich people play an important role of providing essential savings for the economy. And without savings it is impossible to sustain a labor population in present time which is involved in production of intermediate capital goods. And without capital goods it is impossible to increase the future production of final consumption goods, and without that progress (so-called growth) is not possible. Capitalist class - which includes people coming from all strata of society, and not just rich - plays a pivotal role of supplying this saving. If they are forced to allocate their saving to poor people, who will mostly use it for immediate consumption, then society and economy cannot progress and without progress everyone of us will be poor one day for sure.

And people should not forget another vital economic truth that, honest entrepreneur do not become rich by exploiting the public, but they are made rich by their consumers i.e., the same public. Consumers voluntarily buy the products sold by such sellers because they prefer their products over other sellers. And in this process they give their portion of income to these entrepreneurs making them rich in turn. Profit is a signal that the businessman is fulfilling the most urgent wants of his consumers in a best possible way, and that's why he is rich. On the other hand those entrepreneurs who make losses are not fulfilling consumers' wants properly and so they remain poor in turn by going broke! (to deeply understand the beautiful system of profit & loss I will advise my readers to read Mises' wonderful book, Profit and Loss).     
 
So, if Mukesh is an honest entrepreneur then he has all the rights to keep and use his profit in whatever way he wants to. 

Scene 2: Mukesh is a dishonest entrepreneur
But, if Mukesh Ambani is a dishonest entrepreneur and his profit comes solely from his friendships with the government bureaucrats and politicians then he has no right whatsoever on his wealth. Profit generated by such dishonest political maneuvering is immoral. In a system of government such businessmen are working not to serve their consumers but only to serve the politicians and bureaucrats who help them in restricting the market competition. They actively lobby government so to establish their monopolies in the market. Through these monopolies then they fleece the consumers. And because their profit depends on exploiting the political system they don't care about their consumers. In fact they go to any length to harm their consumers for making such illegitimate and immoral profits. 

This type of system is historically known as 'fascism' and sadly in today's world most of the businessmen, especially the big business houses are making their fat profits by this way only.

If Mukesh Ambani (also Ratan Tata and all others) is doing his business in cahoot with the government officials then his profit is illegitimate. If one day India becomes truly a free country then he should be stripped of his illegal profits (property) and should be convicted and punished for his crimes against the people. He and all such dishonest business tycoons should be incarcerated, may be hanged.       

Conclusion
Looking at these economic facts, if Tata and Mukesh both are honest businessmen and they really want to help people of this country then instead of  allocating their profit to the poor people they should use that capital in producing top quality goods at the lowest possible price. They should try to provide as many economic goods as possible to people of India through market competition. Tata and Mukesh both can profit by serving the needs of poor people. There exists a thriving market even in remotest rural poor areas of the world as C. K. Prahalad has shown. All capable entrepreneurs (existing and new ones) should provide top quality private schools, hospitals, private roads, electricity, water works, sanitation, home etc. goods in these areas at the lowest possible price. That will be the best possible moral way of making a difference in poor peoples' lives; that is the only way in which these entrepreneurs can help the poor in mitigating their hardships. Allocation/redistribution of wealth will only result in misery for all of us.   

1 comments:

kapil69 said...
it's not about being honest/dishonest? it's about show-off lavish life style in a locality which is deprived & it doesn't make sense at all. Every entrepreneur can't be like Bill Gates, i agree & there is no need to be. Ambani can purchase Al Burj or anything like that, nobody will ever comment on that.

Post a Comment

Please leave a civilized comment. Use of bad language is strictly prohibited. I always welcome a healthy discussion.

If you want to carry on the discussion further with me (or want me to reply to your comment) then please email me at: adammalthus-blog@yahoo.com. Privately we can continue the discussion.

Thursday, December 10, 2009

IASB

The organisation
Trustees
Members of the IASB
Members of the IFRIC
Senior staff
Advisory bodies
Glossary
Media enquiries
Vacancies
About the IASC Foundation and the IASB

The IASC Foundation is an independent, not-for profit private sector organisation working in the public interest. Its principal objectives are:
to develop a single set of high quality, understandable, enforceable and globally accepted international financial reporting standards (IFRSs) through its standard-setting body, the IASB;
to promote the use and rigorous application of those standards;
to take account of the financial reporting needs of emerging economies and small and medium-sized entities (SMEs); and
to bring about convergence of national accounting standards and IFRSs to high quality solutions.
The governance and oversight of the activities undertaken by the IASC Foundation and its standard-setting body rests with its Trustees, who are also responsible for safeguarding the independence of the IASB and ensuring the financing of the organisation. The Trustees are publicly accountable to a Monitoring Board of public authorities.
Standard-setting
The IASB (International Accounting Standards Board)
The IASB is the independent standard-setting body of the IASC Foundation. Its members (currently 15 full-time members) are responsible for the development and publication of IFRSs, including the IFRS for SMEs and for approving Interpretations of IFRSs as developed by the IFRIC. All meetings of the IASB are held in public and webcast. In fulfilling its standard-setting duties the IASB follows a thorough, open and transparent due process of which the publication of consultative documents, such as discussion papers and exposure drafts, for public comment is an important component. The IASB engages closely with stakeholders around the world, including investors, analysts, regulators, business leaders, accounting standard-setters and the accountancy profession.

The IFRIC (International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee)
The IFRIC is the interpretative body of the IASB. The IFRIC comprises 14 voting members appointed by the Trustees and drawn from a variety of countries and professional backgrounds. The mandate of the IFRIC is to review on a timely basis widespread accounting issues that have arisen within the context of current IFRSs and to provide authoritative guidance (IFRICs) on those issues. IFRIC meetings are open to the public and webcast. In developing interpretations, the IFRIC works closely with similar national committees and follows a transparent, thorough and open due process.
Supporting the objectives of the IASC Foundation
All other activities undertaken by the IASC Foundation in support of the objectives of the organisation are managed by the IASC Foundation’s staff.
Those activities include:
the creation of an XBRL taxonomy for IFRSs and the IFRS for SMEs to facilitate the electronic use, exchange and comparability of financial data prepared in accordance with IFRSs. This is done by the IFRS XBRL team.
the production of high quality, understandable and up to date material including freely downloadable training material for the IFRS for SMEs, and the organisation of conferences and workshops about IFRSs. These activities are grouped within the IASC Foundation Education Initiative.
the protection of the IFRS brand and the support of global convergence through addressing translation and copyright issues and contributing to the financing of the organisation through the provision of publication services. These activities are grouped under Content Management.
operations, including the day-to-day management of and support for the organisation. Also included are communications, improving and expanding external relationships, and promoting a better understanding of the work of the organisation.


Source

IFRS - FAQs

International Financial Reporting Standards
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Accountancy

Key concepts
Accountant · Bookkeeping · Trial balance · General ledger · Debits and credits · Cost of goods sold · Double-entry system · Standard practices · Cash and accrual basis · GAAP / IFRS
Financial statements
Balance sheet · Income statement · Cash flow statement · Equity · Retained earnings
Auditing
Financial audit · GAAS · Internal audit · Sarbanes-Oxley Act · Big Four auditors
Fields of accounting
Cost · Financial · Forensic · Fund · Management · Tax
This box: viewtalkedit
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are Standards,[1] Interpretations and the Framework[2][3] adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
Many of the standards forming part of IFRS are known by the older name of International Accounting Standards (IAS). IAS were issued between 1973 and 2001 by the Board of the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC). On 1 April 2001, the new IASB took over from the IASC the responsibility for setting International Accounting Standards. During its first meeting the new Board adopted existing IAS and SICs. The IASB has continued to develop standards calling the new standards IFRS.
Contents[hide]
1 Structure of IFRS
2 Framework
3 Role of Framework
3.1 Objective of financial statements
3.2 Underlying assumptions
3.3 Qualitative characteristics of financial statements
3.4 Elements of financial statements
3.5 Recognition of elements of financial statements
3.6 Measurement of the Elements of Financial Statements
3.7 Concepts of Capital and Capital Maintenance
3.8 Concepts of Capital
3.8.1 Concepts of Capital Maintenance and the Determination of Profit
4 Requirements of IFRS
5 IASB current projects
6 Adoption of IFRS
6.1 Australia
6.2 Canada
6.3 European Union
6.4 Russia
6.5 Turkey
6.6 Hong Kong
6.7 Singapore
6.8 United States and convergence with US GAAP
6.9 India
6.10 Japan
7 List of IFRS statements with full text links
8 List of Interpretations with full text links
9 Further reading
10 See also
11 References
12 External links

IFRS adoption Status today

News results for ifrs
Ghana Broadcasting Corporation
IFRS switch: Govt confident, industry not so sure‎ - 14 hours ago
But industry says a complete transition from Indian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to IFRS may take time. Auditing professionals say unless ...Business Standard - 18 related articles »
Welcome to the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)
Standard setting body responsible for the development of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs), permitted or required by over 100 countries ...www.iasb.org/ - Cached - Similar -
Access the unaccompanied IFRSs
It allows you to access the unaccompanied IFRSs, the IFRS for SMEs, to register for ... The official unaccompanied IFRS translations are available here ...www.iasb.org/IFRSs/ - Cached - Similar -
International Financial Reporting Standards - Wikipedia, the free ...
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are Standards, Interpretations and the Framework adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board ...
Structure of IFRS - Framework - Role of Frameworken.wikipedia.org/.../International_Financial_Reporting_Standards - Cached - Similar -
AICPA www.IFRS.com - International Financial Reporting Standards ...
Developed by the American Institute of CPAs, IFRS.com provides comprehensive resources for accounting professionals, auditors, financial managers and other ...www.ifrs.com/ - Cached - Similar -
IAS Plus: Summaries of IFRSs and IASs
An Overview of International Financial Reporting Standards ... The term International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) has both a narrow and a broad ...www.iasplus.com/standard/standard.htm - Cached - Similar -
International Financial Reporting Standards Qualification IFRS ...
The Institute offers a Certificate level learning and assessment programme that is flexible and self-taught which is available to both accountants and ...www.icaew.com/.../IFRS/IFRS_Learning_and_assessment_programme - Cached -
KPMG IFRS Institute
The Center for Audit Quality (CAQ) has developed this Guide to IFRS to provide interested parties with useful information and to help facilitate an informed ...www.kpmgifrsinstitute.com/ - Cached - Similar -
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Canada ...
Welcome to PricewaterhouseCoopers' IFRS microsite, providing thorough and detailed information on International Financial Reporting Standards.www.pwc.com/ca/en/ifrs/index.jhtml -
IFRS for Publicly Accountable Enterprises Chartered Accountants ...
Canadian GAAP for Publicly Accountable Enterprises (PAEs) will be replaced with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for fiscal years ...www.cica.ca › ... › IFRS for Publicly Accountable Enterprises - Cached -
:: IFRS ::
Let me take the pleasure of welcoming you all to this exclusive website on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) being launched by ... know ...ifrs.icai.org/ - Cached -
Searches related to ifrs
ifrs vs gaap
ifrs gaap
ifrs 1
pwc ifrs
ifrs 7
iasb
international financial reporting standards
gaap
Next